Human Rights High Court Grants Parent Contact with Child; Violative of Human Rights Under Article 8


Court room of the ECoHR

Human Rights Court, Strasbourg

December 21, 2010: In the case of Anayo v Germany, the European Court of Human Rights Court found that Germany denied Mr. Anayo’s human rights by denying him access to his child — even though he was only the natural father, and not the legal father.  Mr. Anayo was not a citizen of Germany.

Not only was Germany found to have violated his rights, Mr. Anayo was awarded damages.

In the case of Anayo v. Germany, (Application no. 20578/07), JUDGMENT, STRASBOURG 21 December 2010

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Peer Lorenzen, President, Renate Jaeger, Karel Jungwiert, Mark Villiger, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Zdravka Kalaydjieva, Ganna Yudkivska, judges, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar,

Read the case: Anayo v Germany

Read the case analysis: Anayo v Germany Case Analysis by Netherlands Institute of Human Rights

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Anayo, Ariana-Leilani King-Pfeiffer, Ariana-Leilani King-Pheiffer, Ariel King, Ariel Rosita King, Dr. Ariel King, Dr. Ariel Rosita King, German, Germany, innocense in danger, Sabrina Hey, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Human Rights High Court Grants Parent Contact with Child; Violative of Human Rights Under Article 8

  1. Pingback: Ariana-Leilani King-Pfeiffer Misses Her Mother Dr. Ariel Rosita King | The Kings Words of the Day

  2. Pingback: Arlington County Virginia is the Bermuda Triangle of Motherhood | The Kings Words of the Day

Comments are closed.